|
MINERAL POLICY - Sect. 6 : Housing, Regional Impacts |
Section 6 - Policies on Housing, Social and Regional Impacts
General Principles
| 6.1 |
In many developing countries medium and large scale mineral developments
are often accompanied by significant social and cultural impacts. Government sees the
creation of a workable social adjustment strategy as arising from a partnership in which
investors, government and local groups participate. The terms of this partnership need to
be clearly defined from the outset, and should be designed to minimize social/cultural
impacts, and ensure that dislocations occur in a gradual and well-planned manner. |
|
|
| 6.2 |
Government believes that addressing the social impacts of a major mining
project is the joint responsibility of the government and the project sponsor. Mining
companies are encouraged to take a direct interest in community relations and to undertake
social initiatives in their own interests. While Government will undertake aggressive
social adjustment programs, it also believes that direct participation and input by the
mining company must be forthcoming to ensure the success of such programmes. |
|
|
Specific Policies
| 6.3 |
Respect for the customs and cultural traditions of local people is an
important element in establishing an enduring relationship between the mine and the
resident community. As part of its cultural awareness program, mining companies are
expected to identify and preserve all sacred or socially important sites in the mining
areas. Furthermore, mining companies should deal with rural Fijian society through
traditional village authorities, and through the Ministry of Fijian Affairs, to ensure
total support from landowners and area residents. |
|
|
| 6.4 |
Project sponsors are urged to see that all construction and operating
personnel undergo a social orientation course about the people and customs of the mining
region. Government, through the Mineral Resources Department, and the Ministry of Fijian
Affairs, will coordinate the development of the curriculum for this course. The course
need not be lengthy or costly but it should leave mine workers with a clear sense of the
social institutions and cultural traditions existing beyond the mine gate. |
|
|
| 6.5 |
From early in the exploration phase the project sponsor and Government,
through the Ministry of Fijian Affairs, should collaborate on a public information and
education program about the anticipated nature and impact of the project. Government is
mindful that premature release of information may unduly inflate residents expectations,
and will be guided by mining company views on when certain information may appropriately
be released. However, the Government of Fiji believes that a regular information flow
needs to be established fairly early in the project cycle to avoid misconceptions and
unwarranted rumours about potential mine development. Once the project has come into
operation, mine management is urged to consider establishing resident liaison committees
to facilitate information exchange and to provide residents with a forum for airing their
views. |
|
|
| 6.6 |
Government expects mine worker housing to be kept separate from existing
villages. While mining companies may not always need to provide housing, they are expected
to ensure that suitable affordable housing is available for mine workers. All housing for
mine workers must meet the technical specifications as determined by the Development
Control Unit within the Department of Town and Country Planning. |
|
|
| 6.7 |
Government sees the provision of health and education as its primary
social responsibility. However, mining companies - as good corporate citizens - are
encouraged to make a contribution toward basic health and educational facilities for
workers (and their families). In the interests of preserving harmonious relations with the
area residents, these basic social services should be extended to area residents. Where
mine development occurs in proximity to existing social infrastructure facilities, mining
company financial support can be reduced. |
|
|
| 6.8 |
Government policy is to discourage the development of squatter communities
of unemployed migrants, which often arise around mine sites. . To this end the mining
company should try to ensure that all temporary buildings, infrastructure and facilities
are removed from the project area as soon as they are no longer needed. Any permanent
buildings or other facilities which the mining company wishes to use must be under the
company's direct control. |
|
|
| 6.9 |
Mining companies should be aware that Government promotes the employment
of local workers from the mining region, to redirect some of the benefits from mine
development directly to the local residents. However, residents in many rural areas are
not likely to have all the skills required by a new project and, indeed, some rural areas
may be hard pressed to meet even the mines unskilled labour needs, without a substantial
disruption to rural life. Government policy is to facilitate the employment of area
residents at the mine by targeting mine area residents for mine-related study scholarships
and training, however, employment of mine area residents is at the discretion of the
mining companies. |
|
|
|